In context of his philosophy, his Ethics in particular, the definitions Baruch Spinoza posits are functionally similar to the “revelations” of revealed scripture. Deny their validity or importance and his conclusions, meanings, and propositions are rendered absurd. The definitions can not be doubted without destroying the edifice which they found. In both theology and rational philosophy, valid reasoning is essential, but when revelation is doubted, explained, contextualized or otherwise secularized, it is a small, yet welcome relief to turn to Spinoza’s definitions for solace.

Share/Save